afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Richard W.M. Jones]

This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/

lzma is dead upstream.

afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.

It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).

However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the
resolution for this?

Rich.

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Post by Richard W.M. Jones
lzma is dead upstream.
afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).
However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the
resolution for this?

I suppose at least part of the problem is ...

<***@seznam.cz> (expanded from <afflib-***@fedoraproject.org>): host
mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of
`redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
Rich.

--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedorapr

[Florian Weimer]

Post by Richard W.M. Jones

Post by Richard W.M. Jones
lzma is dead upstream.
afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).
However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the
resolution for this?

I suppose at least part of the problem is ...
mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of
`redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM command)

That looks like a Fedora mail infrastructure issue. Something needs to
rewrite the envelope sender when forwarding mail.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel

[Kevin Fenzi]

Post by Richard W.M. Jones

Post by Richard W.M. Jones
lzma is dead upstream.
afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).
However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the
resolution for this?

I suppose at least part of the problem is ...
mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of
`redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
Rich.

Can you provide the entire set of headers here? It's hard to tell whats
going on without the whole picture.

Feel free to just send that to me directly...

kevin

[Miro Hrončok]

Post by Richard W.M. Jones
lzma is dead upstream.
afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).
However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the
resolution for this?

Open a bugzilla?

--
Miro Hrončok

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Post by Miro Hrončok

Post by Richard W.M. Jones
lzma is dead upstream.
afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).
However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the
resolution for this?

Open a bugzilla?

I thought there was a bug from last time, but apparently I didn't
file one ... Anyway there is now:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655170

Rich.

--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@lists.f

[Artur Iwicki]

I'd be willing to adopt sonar, but given that:
1) the package is several years out-of-date
2) upstream name of the project changed
3) I'm a tad busy at the moment and don't have much free time

...I think it'll be a better course of action on my side to let the package be retired, and then package it anew when I have the time.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

f2py orphan 68 weeks ago

This is has been dead.package'd 11 years ago
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/f2py/c/136219df3f49bff7e07017cbc3786f9f92b7461a?branch=master).
Maybe something went wrong in the dist-git conversion 8 years ago?

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/li

[Frank Crawford]

On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:

Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any
message about it.

s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago

If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.

Regards
Frank

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Post by Frank Crawford
Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any
message about it.

s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago

If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.

orphan != retired. You don't need a reason to orphan something other than
just not having enough time.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/deve

[Frank Crawford]

Post by Frank Crawford
Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any
message about it.
s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago
If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.
orphan != retired. You don't need a reason to orphan something other than
just not having enough time.

Yep, and if that is the case, I'm happy to take it on, I just don't
want to take on something that has an underlying issue I have missed.

And I mainly asked as it was just orphaned, and I may have missed a
message about it.

Post by Frank Crawford
Zbyszek

Frank

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

Post by Frank Crawford
Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any
message about it.
s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago

Is there any need for s3cmd with awscli available and supported?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/lis

[Frank Crawford]

Post by Frank Crawford
Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any
message about it.
s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago
Is there any need for s3cmd with awscli available and supported?

That is a good question, which I haven't really looked at in detail, I
just know that I use it a bit in various scripts, etc, and it is still
supported upstream with recent changes.

Since the swap from s3cmd to awscli isn't a straight drop-in
replacement, I suspect there are probably a few similar to me who won't
change over for a while, if ever.

Regards
Frank

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the
affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken
dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected
package gets retired.
Unretire packages at https://pagure.io/releng/issues
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt
that have been orphaned for 6+ weeks in 3 weeks from now, will be sending
e-mails like this each week.

[...]

rathann: js-jquery1

This is a dependency of lazygal, which bundles an old 1.11.0 version
and which I unbundle during build. I reported this upstream:
https://bitbucket.org/niol/lazygal/issues/27/bundled-jquery-1110-is-old-and-vulnerable

Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@lis

[Vít Ondruch]

Post by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the
affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken
dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected
package gets retired.
Unretire packages at https://pagure.io/releng/issues
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt
that have been orphaned for 6+ weeks in 3 weeks from now, will be sending
e-mails like this each week.

[...]

rathann: js-jquery1

This is a dependency of lazygal, which bundles an old 1.11.0 version
https://bitbucket.org/niol/lazygal/issues/27/bundled-jquery-1110-is-old-and-vulnerable

Although I am not happy about it, I requested unorphaning the package:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7955

But of course, replacing jQuery 1.x by some thing more up2date is advised.


Vít

Post by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Regards,
Dominik

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@lists.fed

[Tristan Cacqueray]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

[...]
[...]

tdecacqu: python-os-client-config

Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as (co-)maintainer
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
no longer used by most of the openstack projects:

http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=os-client-config&i=nope&files=requirements.txt&repos=

Regards,
-Tristan

[Miro Hrončok]

Post by Tristan Cacqueray

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

[...]
[...]

tdecacqu: python-os-client-config

Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as (co-)maintainer
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
no longer used by most of the openstack projects.

However other packages depend on it:

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-os-client-config
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python3-os-client-config
nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch

Also, it was taken already:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947

--
Miro Hrončok

[Alfredo Moralejo Alonso]

Post by Miro Hrončok

Post by Tristan Cacqueray

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

[...]
[...]

tdecacqu: python-os-client-config

Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as (co-)maintainer
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
no longer used by most of the openstack projects.

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-os-client-config
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python3-os-client-config
nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947

Yes, i've taken, in fact i was maintainer for this already but i didn't
receive any notification about issues with this package. Anyway, i've
created a rebuild without python3 subpackage which i guess was the problem.

Post by Miro Hrončok
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Miro Hrončok]

Post by Tristan Cacqueray

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you

know for

Post by Tristan Cacqueray

sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a

proper
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Post by Tristan Cacqueray
[...]
[...]

tdecacqu: python-os-client-config

Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as

(co-)maintainer

Post by Tristan Cacqueray
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
no longer used by most of the openstack projects.

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-os-client-config
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python3-os-client-config
nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947
Yes, i've taken, in fact i was maintainer for this already but i didn't
receive any notification about issues with this package. Anyway, i've
created a rebuild without python3 subpackage which i guess was the problem.

The problem here was that the package was orphaned. That is now solved,
thanks.

For the Python 2 problem, I guess thanks, but please make sure to solve
this as well or you'll get broken dependencies:

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-osc-lib
python-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.src
python-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.src
python2-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.noarch
python2-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.noarch
python2-muranoclient-0:1.0.1-2.fc30.noarch

--
Miro Hrončok

[Alfredo Moralejo Alonso]

Post by Tristan Cacqueray

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you

know for

Post by Tristan Cacqueray

sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a

proper

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Post by Tristan Cacqueray
[...]
[...]

tdecacqu: python-os-client-config

Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as

(co-)maintainer

Post by Tristan Cacqueray
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it

is

Post by Tristan Cacqueray
no longer used by most of the openstack projects.

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-os-client-config
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python3-os-client-config
nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947
Yes, i've taken, in fact i was maintainer for this already but i didn't
receive any notification about issues with this package. Anyway, i've
created a rebuild without python3 subpackage which i guess was the

problem.
The problem here was that the package was orphaned. That is now solved,
thanks.
For the Python 2 problem, I guess thanks, but please make sure to solve
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-osc-lib
python-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.src
python-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.src
python2-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.noarch
python2-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.noarch
python2-muranoclient-0:1.0.1-2.fc30.noarch

ok, i know some of them are also fixed but others may still need fix.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Raphael Groner]

Hi Miro,

I looked in pagure for some of those packages in your list and found hints like "Created by orphan a year ago " e.g. Quake2. There's quake2, too but not orphaned and actively maintained. Maybe some of those orphans exist because of improper apply of our rename process.

Regards, Raphael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@lists.fe

[Raphael Groner]

Hi,

I would like take pykka. Is there a new package review required to unorphan this package?

Regards, Raphael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@lists.fedoraproject.or