Discussion:
Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you
Kalev Lember
2018-12-10 19:05:38 UTC
Permalink
It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x
is `pkgconfig(modulemd-2.0)`. The source of the conflict between the
two -devel subpackages is that they both want to own
/usr/lib64/libmodulemd.so, symlinked to different objects.
Perhaps it would then make sense to rename libmodulemd.so to
libmodulemd-2.so in 2.x, so they don't conflict?

Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives
Neal Gompa
2018-12-10 19:21:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kalev Lember
It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x
is `pkgconfig(modulemd-2.0)`. The source of the conflict between the
two -devel subpackages is that they both want to own
/usr/lib64/libmodulemd.so, symlinked to different objects.
Perhaps it would then make sense to rename libmodulemd.so to
libmodulemd-2.so in 2.x, so they don't conflict?
No. It's better that the development subpackages conflict. There's
zero reason for them to be co-installable.

--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/***@l
Fabio Valentini
2018-12-10 19:19:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kalev Lember
It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x
is `pkgconfig(modulemd-2.0)`. The source of the conflict between the
two -devel subpackages is that they both want to own
/usr/lib64/libmodulemd.so, symlinked to different objects.
Perhaps it would then make sense to rename libmodulemd.so to
libmodulemd-2.so in 2.x, so they don't conflict?
Why? The unversioned .so files are supposed to conflict between different
versions of the -devel packages (at least they usually do, see openssl and
it's compat package, for example). Installing both versions of the -devel
package at the same time isn't necessary (or supported) anyway.
Post by Kalev Lember
Kalev
_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Loading...